Home > 2011 | 2009 | 2001 | 1996 Files | 1987 Transcripts | 1999 Katriuk | Critiques

Huffington Post | 27Mar2012 | Tom Teicholz

Demjanjuk's Just Epitaph

[J.S. Tom Teicholz wrote an incredibly biased dishonest book about "The Trial of Ivan the Terrible: State of Israel Vs. John Demjanjuk decades ago and now follows up with an incredibly biased dishonest "epitaph" which proves at least that he is a consistent hater.]

The recent death of John Demjanjuk, 91, in a nursing home in Germany, brings to a close one of the most extensive and most contested Nazi war crimes prosecution in history, a process that began in the United States in the mid 1970's and was ongoing at the time of his death as Demjanjuk awaited the appeal of his conviction in Germany as an accessory to the more than 28,000 murders of Jewish men, women and children committed during the time he served as a camp guard at the Sobibor extermination camp.

In the immediate aftermath of his death there will be those, no doubt, who will argue that he was an innocent or at best served under duress, or was at worse a mere cog in the machine. There will be those who would repeat the canards expressed throughout his more than 30 years of prosecution in the United States, Israel and Germany, that the damning documents which prove his Nazi service were fakes and KGB forgeries, even though every court at every stage that has examined the documents has found them authentic and consistent with each other, proving that Demjanjuk was the bearer of a Nazi identification card #1393 issued at the Trawniki training camp that lists and correlates his Nazi service not only at Trawniki and Sobibor, but also subsequently at the Flossenburg and Majdanek camps. There will be those who argue against the trying of old men, against the waste of resources, the time, the money, the prosecutorial effort.

There will be also many who, having no argument with Demjanjuk's prosecution or conviction, will still, in the face of Demjanjuk's long life and the thought of him spending his final days in a nursing home in Germany, will ask: was justice done?

As someone who spent many months in the Jerusalem courtroom attending the trial of Demjanjuk and followed closely every stage of his American and German proceedings, I would argue that, to borrow a biblical phrase, not only was justice done, it was seen to be done.

The notion that Demjanjuk, awaiting the appeal of his German conviction, living in a nursing home was "free" is to ignore the reality of his existence confined in a foreign country cut off from family, friends, and community, left to die with the mark of Cain upon him. The fact that almost every article concerning his death contained the words "convicted Nazi camp guard" is only one small measure of history's judgment and of Justice being done. Although under German law, because Demjanjuk died before his appeal could be argued, the German court's guilty judgment is legally nullified, Margarete Noetzel, the court spokesman, said the conviction remains "a historical fact."

Demjanjuk's prosecutions have added greatly to our knowledge of how the final solution, the unfathomable murder of millions, was carried out by the unexceptional, and not only by the Germans but by their willing collaborators and henchmen. The death camps were commanded by Germans and staffed by their auxiliary guards, such as Demjanjuk, with whom the murders could not have been accomplished.

Despite the fact that Demjanjuk denied any and all involvement in the crimes of the Holocaust, he was demonstrated to be an exceptionally bad liar whose own accounts of his whereabouts were riddled with inconsistencies, impossibilities, untruths and evasions that bordered on admissions. The record by now is all too clear: born in Soviet Ukraine, he was a Red Army soldier captured by the Germans who volunteered to serve the Nazis. Trained at Trawniki and issued his Nazi I.D. there, he became an experienced camp guard serving at labor, concentration and extermination camps whose only function was the expeditious murder of innocent civilian Jewish men, women and children. He may have also served in the pro-Nazi Vaslov Army by his own admission, and by reason of a Nazi blood group tattoo that he tried to erase. All of which, even any of which, had Demjanjuk revealed when he applied to or entered the United States, would have been sufficient cause to deny him admission, bar him from citizenship and which were cause for his denaturalization and deportation.

Those murdered at Sobibor and the other camps where Demjanjuk served cannot cry out for justice. There are no graves, other than the mass graves where they were killed, at which to mourn them. It is easy to imagine that those who committed the crimes thought that no one would ever know who the perpetrators were or, worse, that no one would care. Perhaps they imagined that they could, like Demjanjuk, deny everything. Who would prosecute them? What could they prove? It is to the everlasting credit of the United States, Israel and Germany that over the last three decades they continued to prosecute the guilty, not only the planners, or the officials, not just the commandants but the guards and policemen, not just the desktop murderers but also those with blood on their hands.

[W.Z. Tom Teicholz continues to pimp for the Holocaust Industry.]

The generation that saw the Nazi horrors firsthand will soon pass from this world. Demjanjuk's trial may well be the last major Nazi war crimes trial. If so, then Demjanjuk's epitaph is just: not that he died a free man but that he died, in the eyes of the world and for all history that follows, a convicted Nazi war camp guard.

This opinion essay originally appeared in The Jewish Journal of Los Angeles.