***************************************************************************
Will Zuzak; DESCROCK.002 = Gazette article 1994-01-26; 1994-01-26
***************************************************************************
Dear Subscribers:
The following letter appeared in today's Gazette:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
War-crimes case of Windsor, Ont., man moves to Budapest to videotape
elderly witnesses
by STEHEN BINDMAN, SOUTHAM NEWS
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
OTTAWA - The war-crimes case against an elderly Windsor, Ont., man is
moving to an unusual locale next month - the Canadian embassy in Budapest.
Justice Department prosecutors and lawyers for 82-year-old Radislav
Grujicic will travel to the Hungarian capital to videotape the testimony of
17 elderly witnesses.
Some of the testimony, which will be supervised by a retired Canadian
judge, may be played back at Grujicic's jury trial scheduled to begin in
April.
"If the witnesses are available, then obviously we're not going to use
the video," said chief prosecutor Ivan Whitehall.
"But some of the witnesses indicated that they would not come or
cannot come to Canada because of their age. Others may want to come but
all of these people are old people and therefore I want to make sure that
should something happen between now and then, I have their evidence. It's
insurance."
Although all of the witnesses are from the former Yugoslavia, Budapest
was chosen "for the mutual convenience of all concerned," Whitehall said.
"There are a variety of factors but obviously the current situation in
Yugoslavia is one of them."
The federal government will pay all the costs of the trip, which could
last two to three weeks.
Permission to take evidence abroad was given by an Ontario judge
despite objections from Grujicic's lawyer.
In 1991, the war-crimes case against a Renfrew, Ont., man crumbled
after another judge twice refused permission to send a special commission
to the former Soviet Union and Germany to videotape evidence. The judge
ruled Michael Pawlowski would not receive a fair trial if the videotaped
testimony of 12 witnesses was played before a Canadian jury.
Grujicic, who also uses the name Marko Jankovic, was charged in
December 1992 with war crimes committed in German-occupied Yugoslavia
during World War II.
The retired book-seller, who came to Canada in 1948, has pleaded not
guilty to 10 counts of murder and one count each of conspiracy to commit
murder and kidnapping.
He is alleged to have been a senior member of the Belgrade Special
Police and accused of participating with Nazi occupation forces in the
roundup of suspected communists and communist sympathizers. They were
either murdered or sent to forced labor camps in Germany between 1941 and
1944.
The Justice Department's war-crimes unit has faced heavy criticism
from Jewish groups for its slowness in launching prosecutions since 1987
Criminal Code amendments allowed Canadian courts to try charges related to
war crimes committed elsewhere.
Grujicic was the first person charged by the Nazi-hunters in almost
three years.
All previous prosecutions ended in failure - two sets of charges were
dropped while the jury acquittal of retired Toronto restaurateur Imre Finta
has been appealed to the Supreme Court of Canada.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gazette, Montreal, Wednesday, January 26, 1994 - B4
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note that the article does not give the name of the Ontario judge, who
gave permission to take evidence abroad (contrary to to previous rulings by
Justice James Chadwick), nor does it name the retired Canadian judge who
will be supervising the proceedings.
The situation reminds me of the Otto Horn testimony in the Demjanjuk
case, which with appropriate OSI coaching turned into a positive
identification from what had originally been a negative one. Staged dress
rehearsals may be useful in the movie and entertainment businesses, but it
is completely inappropriate in the field of justice.
As you may have guessed from my previous postings, I am categorically
opposed to the "mail-order" justice the above scenario implies. If the
witnesses are well enough to travel to Budapest, then they are well enough
to travel to and testify in Canada.
***************************************************************************
Will Zuzak; DESCROCK.002 = Gazette article 1994-01-26; 1994-01-26
***************************************************************************